[arch] Pacman slow after upgrade?

[Rodrigo Coacci]

On 1/1/07, ded <my.accountnow at ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 11:49:25PM +0800, Rock Feng wrote:
> > On 2007/01/01 ?? 13:38:05, Rodrigo Coacci wrote:
> > >I've noticed that almost any command I give to pacman takes much more
> time than
> > >it used to take, and that became to happen after I upgraded it. Is that
> just me
> > >or someone else can confirm it?
> > >
> > Pacman,emm...slow always :)
>
> I haven't noticed any noticeable decrease in the speed of pacman since the
> upgrade. As a side note, I'm quite impressed with pacman overall. I
> moved from Debian after many years to FC5 and, to me, yum leaves a
> lot to be desired. Pacman is like a breath of fresh air, and one of
> the deciding factors to settle on Arch as my new distro of choice.
>
> Dan


Yes compared to debian (and derivatives) Arch is a breeze in EVERYTHING....
With RPM tools it isn't even fair to compare... :-P
That's why I love it.
But as i'm using Arch for a year or so, I can tell you that previous
versions of were (apparently at least) faster.

_______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> arch at archlinux.org
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>



-- 
Abraços,
      Rodrigo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/attachments/20070101/ce4ebd13/attachment.html