On Mittwoch, 22. August 2007 18:35 waldek wrote: > And by the way why the package version is 1.392 instead of 8.77? The Revision number in http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/dcraw.c shows 1.392 ... so perhaps you have to ask the original author of the software why he offers two different numbers.-) But you be right that this is not nice. See you, Attila