[arch] New release schedule

[Ravi Desai]

I agree, the rolling-release system of Arch is depicted much better with
the  YYYYMM format.

Ravster

Mircea Bardac  wrote:
>On Wednesday 11 April 2007 19:06:40 Michel Di Croci wrote:
>
>> > I like the new idea, the only thing I don't totally approve is the
>> > numbering system (YYYYMM). Since we're following more a kernel 
>>numbering
>> > system I would have used this characteristics. Like the next version 
>>could
>> > have been 2.6.22 or 2.6.24 but I don't know how to manage the trouble 
>>of
>> > having so many digits  ;) >
>> > Or something like Arch2 6.22, And when the new kernel is released, we 
>>could
>> > go to Arch3 2.1 (like Kernel 3.2.1) but I think it's taking to much
>> > place... that was just a suggestion...
>>
>Well, even though releases follow kernel releases, I believe the 
>rolling-release-system can be "seen" a lot easier through time-stamps than 
>through (kernel) versions.
>
>My only problem with the digits is the fact that there's no separator in 
>YYYYMM, and it's a bit difficult to read. Other than that, it's ok, from my 
>point of view.
>
>
>Regards,
>Mircea

_________________________________________________________________
Get the Kung Fu Bunny Theme pack free! 
http://www.imagine-windowslive.com/Themes/Messenger/Reward/Default.aspx?Locale=en-CA#