[arch] Again on the "Firefox Affair"

[Rodrigo Coacci]

On 12/12/06, Jan de Groot <jan at jgc.homeip.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 20:58 +0100, bardo wrote:
> > Is there any official Arch position about this?
> > http://steelgryphon.com/blog/?p=96
> >
> >
>
> The only thing that it would change IMHO is the place to get patches
> from. There's nothing in the article about the licensing and trademark
> issues.


Yes but from what I understood, if the patches trouble is settled down, the
only one with license/trademark issues is Debian because of their freedom
policy. Or did I miss something?

_______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> arch at archlinux.org
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>



-- 
Abraços,
      Rodrigo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/attachments/20061212/b18db949/attachment.html