[arch] ntfs-3g-2006115 failed mount

[Thomas Bächler]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Attila schrieb:
> I see that fuse 2.6.1 is out and so i have one question about it: Could it
> better to deaktivate fuse in the kernel(s) so that the kernel package(s)
> comes without the fuse modul and the fuse package will be compiled with it
> own kernel modul?

It would be possible, but it would require a single fuse package for
each kernel. It is generally less work to have it in the kernel.

> This is only a question because i think you know it better what is easier to
> handle this in the future.

I hope there will be no "in the future". fuse kernel module changes are
ahead of the mainline kernel, and ntfs-3g actually depends on those
changes. I think either ntfs-3g guys should be slower or the kernel guys
should include it faster (changes are in -mm kernel).

FUSE 2.6.1 has some minor changes to the kernel module, but I think we
can live without them for now.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFcskjEda5KzHP/VARAncdAJ9eVazvr6Lg8lFsIbJdXVN9dVb0qACgminh
X1yGAdr6K/OB0QbHBxOCuF0=
=m0k7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----