[arch] Hi everybody, and Beyond problems

[James Rayner]

On Sunday 30 July 2006 23:13, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Rohan Dhruva schrieb:
> > Most probably your problem is related to suspend2 itself and not the
> > beyond kernel patchset. A better place, imo, to ask would be the
> > suspend2 mailing lists.
> >
> > http://suspend2.net/lists
>
> No, ask on the (new) beyond bugtracker. I recently compared suspend2
> stability between a vanilla+suspend2 kernel and a beyond kernel, and beyond
> lost (indeed, every beyond version I used was unusable with suspend2).
> I am planning to maintain a vanilla kernel with suspend2 patches in the
> future, see the forums for discussion about that
> (http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=23518).

Yeah, 2.6.17-beyond2x was completely screwed up for suspend as suspend didnt 
really like dynticks, however I spent some lengthy time getting it working in 
beyond3 and have yet to have any complaints apart from that it requires 
mkinitcpio from testing.

Not that I saw any complaints from you either though before that, you say you 
tested beyond and it didnt work - and you didnt file a bug, yet you managed 
to make a suspend2 package in [community] -- community isnt the bug tracker 
mate.

beyond3 should be just as stable for suspend as any vanilla based option now.

James